Board Thread:Unanswered Questions/@comment-26298928-20150812062204/@comment-26928960-20150827194356

Hm, i see, but i understand comparison between aircraft... you see, comparing an R-101 or an F/A-22A to an, say, Su-25TM, an A-10A, FB-22A Aries or an B-1B is an absurd (comparing fighters with attackers or a bomber?). But i wanna know, for an instance: an lv.8 PAK-FA or an lv.10 Su-37 or F/A-22A (imaginating it surpasses the status bar of an lv.1 R-101 Neucom in any way, and not accounting parts for it), so it doesn't mean that the PAK-FA, or the Terminator, or the Raptor is better than the Neucom? Or it means that they all have both the same input, so it all goes down to the pilot? 'Cause second this logic, since it has a better status bar, then it should be superior than the other planes... it's a bit confusing, y'know.