Thread:Wihan Tan/@comment-1824272-20150311185027/@comment-17715382-20150312071914

Lloyd Dunamis wrote: that my edits of these were non-quality...although yeah, it is my fault: I spearheaded in putting that in without having discussion & agreement first, so criticism gladly taken. Sorreh~ =w=; If you think my words directly pointed to you, you are totally wrong dude. I said random contributors doesn't mean it would be this guy or that guy. God, people these days took the words too easily.

Which that I have big doubt when someone with random IP inputs the amount of required research reports. Can it be trusted? Of course NOT. Because this rsc variable is hard to be 100% reliable.

This rsc variable is TOO AMBITIOUS what I can say. Neither gwiki or seesaawiki have that. So, we want to be the only one that has all the details about an aircraft? Remember, not everything that ambitious are good for the result in the end. If it is not handled properly, you will see the "fallen".