Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-71.199.159.36-20140613025257

question.... just about 24 hours ago, i edited some info about the A-6 and EA-6B that was incorrect..... i had nothing to do, so i went browsing through a lot of the other aircraft.............. wow.........thats all i have to say.

about 63% of the aircraft ( of actuall real world aircraft ) I viewed, have gross incorrect data. my problem with this,  i understand acepedia is "User" data entry. but at the same time,  this site quotes, " FAS DOD-101"  "global security.org" and several other "FACTUAL" data sources on these aircraft. as a veteran, USMC E-6 0357, this upsets me, why? your referencing live websites with confirmed data and mis-representing that data here in the form of "User" entry that is highly incorrect, im 99% positive if those website owners found out they are being referenced and then incorrect data is being used while pointed in their direction.... they would not be happy at all.

the ultimatum:  do you guys have a "Staff" that verifies this stuff? i already know the answer to the "verification" aspect, but if your going to be putting references to other websites of confirmed data and then allow people to post incorrect data while pointing at those sites, your asking for trouble.

as a very high knowledged person of actual Military experience and system specifications, im willing to offer to take that "Staff" position. 