Thread:Rappy 4187/@comment-1824272-20160623221022

Concerning your edit to Common.js, I thought the point of the JS review process was to evaluate a code as being secure and functional and non-obfuscated, not to physically edit the code depending on one Support member's beliefs on how JS should be written.

We didn't ask for the imports being moved (and you also removed a comment helping us to locate the duplicate image page should we forget where it is), nor did we ask to evaluate my code spacing. I'd like to request future JS reviews on Acepedia to not review the general quality of the code, which is literally what the JS review process states. 