Thread:SlyCooperFan1/@comment-1346412-20140131053227/@comment-1824272-20140131054820

There's pros and cons of both of them, and I kinda wanna mingle the two together.


 * The Description section should get thrown out the window, at least how it is right now. I really do not want any real-life information about the aircraft on the articles whatsoever. If you want them, feel free to convince me otherwise, but I feel like they don't belong here on Acepedia when users can just click to Wikipedia and see all of that over there.
 * I suppose the section could be edited to describe the aircraft itself - its role, its strengths, its weaknesses - as it appears in Ace Combat. If it appears in more than one game, hopefully the stats will generally be similar across the games it's featured in.
 * Since I mentioned Wikipedia, we should also use that Template:WPIcon we made a while back. Just wanted to mention it.
 * I really like the idea of using the tab system just for the Game Analysis section (title, btw, should be both caps, not just "Game analysis"). Makes more sense than having it for the entire article. Really liking that, might as well keep it.
 * I noticed you included a History blurb in the articles, to a varying degree in each of the two. I say we instead push this to the Game Analysis tabs?
 * Trivia section should stay as it is in the first example article. Should stay separate from the game-by-game tabs, so I like how it is there.

What do you think about these "edits"?

Also, don't push any of this live to any pages on Acepedia yet. I'm in the middle of working on the Acepedia namespace articles, including the policies, and one thing I definitely want to do is article "templates" (not exactly templates that you include on pages, but copy/paste that people can use to make articles). So once we solve this, I'll make a "template" for the aircraft articles and push it live with the other "templates" (for example, mission articles, which we've already got started), and we can start from there. Sound good?