User talk:Protostealth

Hi, welcome to AceWiki! Thanks for your edit to the Larry Foulke page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- KyleH (Talk) 03:48, 1 May 2009

ES support
Well hey there. Yes, this is Ribbon-Azure. I've been an admin here for about two years. Sup? Buffalosoldier 92  18:49, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Ribbon-Azure? Pleased to meet you, sir.


 * Yes, Ribbon-Azure. http://electrosphere.info/index.php?showuser=37 -- that's my ES account. I made yourself and HavocReaper admins since you guys seem to be more into this thing than I am. Good luck, if you need help, just ask. Ribbon- Azure  19:49, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

My fellow Admin,
Add this to the top of your page: And when you do, put the Administrators category on your page.  Havoc  Reaper  48   01:00, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Small thing
Proto, when you comment on a talk page or forum, you have to 'sign' your comments by adding four ~'s at the end of each post. It's a cross-wiki policy, and it's pretty un-admin like to leave posts unsigned. Signing will show who exactly made the comment and the date/time of when it was made. Also, you can customize your sig, I myself take pride in making mine awesome, try:

 Proto  Stealth  

Add that code to the "signature" part of your preferences, and the next time you sign your sig with the four ~'s, your name will appear like that. Tweak it if you want, it's all customizable.  Havoc  Reaper  48   03:23, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the hint, Havoc. *goes off to ze prepherenzes*  Proto  Stealth   04:19, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Do Not Feed The Trolls
"Inserting false information: Good job trolling the wikia, dumbshit. Now get the hell out of here."...? These words typed by you when you banned this guy, by saying that, you yourself trolled the so-called troll, don't put yourself on the same level as him. Don't overreact, you're not in trouble (this time), but please, chill.  Havoc  Reaper  48   22:12, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

[/irony]

Sorry man, it's because I got a little nervous because I'm discussing a deal with the co-admin of ACSkies, so they can help with the ES.info/ACW project.

Re:Recent category
Category:Battles of the Circum Pacific War? Isn't the the Circum-Pacific War? The "-" is part of the official title, no? Just curious.  Havoc  Reaper  48   20:16, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, 'scuse me. Is there a way to change category titles? Unsigned comment made by User:Protostealth
 * Unfortunately, not that I know of, try deleting the page and recreating it with the appropriate title. And also, don't forget your fabulous sig I designed for you at the end of comments.  Havoc  Reaper  48   20:25, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

CFA-44 Estovakia paint scheme
Thanks for the tip, does that include SP colours?

Lucan Bristow 09:54, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

SP colours as in the only SP one or the DLC ones?

For the SP, AFAIK, you have to acquire most achievements (44 at least). For the online ones, try out playing with the ES.info crew.

No, I meant the SP colours you get by shooting down the Aces who appear in Expert mode.

No. You only shoot down the aces for the respective SP scheme.

I should have been more specific, I meant do I have to aqquire the SP colours from shooting down all the Aces to get the Estovakia scheme for the CFA-44?

Yes. You shoot down all the aces, then complete one more mission to get the paint scheme. Enough for you?  Proto  Stealth   17:12, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, sorry for the confusionLucan Bristow 12:26, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Deleting pages vs. redirecting pages
Hello, sysop. Recently, you've deleted the entries on Silber Squadron and Indigo Squadron. While I fully agree with you that having duplicate redundant entries on the same topic is a waste, I urge you to redirect such pages instead of deleting them outright. The reason is that some other pages probably contain links to the deleted pages and so deleting the latter creates red links in the former, ruining the wiki consistency. The redirects are a cheap way to ensure that all links to duplicate entries converge into the single main page. --Koveras Alvane 07:08, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

teh blockz
Proto, you're really only supposed to protect pages if they're under vandalism attack/is being edit warred. Instead take the debate to the talk page... there's really no point in protecting it hoping for proof that it's canonical (someone might actually want to update with proof).

Re:Aero
So... do we keep the article or merge it with a list of the other rookies from the same picture you uploaded? I'm thinking the latter, but I want to know what you think.  Havoc  Reaper  48   18:59, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

I'd assume we're better off doing an article concerning the squadron of the nuked newbies.

Questions
Hi

I dont know if anybody noticed this

before but in Ace combat 5, there are 7

hidden planes in the plane select screen

besides the x-02 and the falken. I kmow this has been discussed

before, but if you have any idea how to unlock these planes

can you help?

just wonderingY

You mean the ones past the ADF-01 with the / on them?

yes

Yes the ones with the / on them

i know everybody seen them im

really trying to figure out how

to unlock them. Do you what they

are? What the planes are called?

I would appreciate the help ProtoStealth :)

Sadly, they're merely empty spaces. There's no other unlockable planes. Yeah, sad, I know.

????
? Uh, Kove I can understand, but Grabacr and Ace commander? What? Dude, don't abuse the b'crat tool like that. Also... FOR HOW LONG WERE YOU A B'CRAT AND I WAS STILL A BASIC ADMIN???? :P  Havoc Reaper '48  19:06, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oh shi- Proto  Stealth   19:33, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Hi Proto

We were just recently talking about AC5

unlockable aircraft with the / on them.

By any chance could email Namco about it?

I mean c'mon there the ones that made those

spaces. They should have an idea on how to

unlock them.

Its alot to ask, but if you can

can you try?

Just wondering

Appreciate the help Protostealth :)24.109.65.103 12:15, April 8, 2010 (UTC)Dev

Hmm... sounds like a good idea. I'll email Namco when I have time; a survivor has to enjoy RE5, you know.

Namco
Have you EMAILED

Namco yet?

Answers?

Thanks

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm..... Are you there!??????????/// HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Be a little patient; I still need Namco's email.

EDIT: Success! We did it, pack brother (haha, Halo 3 reference) man!

I'm mailin' them. Keep on tuned.

question
Out of curiosity, what AC games do you have? It'd be nice to put them on ya user page...  Havoc Reaper '48  19:06, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

Fires of Liberation. Once owned The Unsung War & 0 but I hopped in on teh xbawx bandwagon.

U'Z TEW NAO STEELING'D MAI PURRFECT ED1T SUMMARI??? ...but seriously, though, update your page, it's been a month.  Havoc Reaper '48  19:28, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

Get back
On IRC.  Havoc Reaper '48  01:32, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

PS, reporting in.


 * Uh, sorry, NOW come on.  Havoc Reaper '48  18:46, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Namco 2
Hi Protostealth

Have you found Namcos e-mail

yet? I can help if you want me too.

They should have it open to the public for

questions dont you think?

Anyways,

I would appreciate the help

24.109.65.103 12:20, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but I already sent them an email. However, they haven't replied as of this writing.

Jeee, thanks Protostealth.

It was really driving me bananas about

these 7 empty spaces. I mean c'mon,

everybody at lest on ace mode and looking

for something more, if you know what I mean.

Keep me posted

Thanks24.109.65.103 23:52, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

I got the email; however, I had sent a mail to Namco's support section, therefore they could not help me. FTW

Wow, well thanks anyway Protostealth. Tooooooo dang complicated thanks 00:58, May 2, 2010 (UTC)24.109.65.103

americans
You might not notice it immediately, but americans have taken over the world we live in.Just look all around you,take for example, the F22 on this web page, not only is it a good fighter aircraft, but it represents the ultimate symbol of american authority and supremacy in our skies.I have no hatred for americans, but, the fact that you think I do, is purely based on fiction.--Zachary12345 05:12, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

No, I meant "what the hell's going on here" as in "what's the situation". Understood?

whats a bawx
whats a bawx?

AceWikia slang for infobox.

.
Any articles in need of cleanup? Gimme all the ones you know.

The UI-4053 Sphryna page could use some work. Also, do what you do always Grabacr: get info on ground/sea vehicles of the AC series.

Im here for.....
If you are asking why am I here? I'm here to correct the wrong info people have been putting here. I am also here because im a ACX fan. --Unsigned comment made by User:Grabacr 1

ACX fan? Great. We could use images & articles on the landscape of the Aurelia-Leasath regions.  Proto  Stealth   16:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

yeah. ACX and AC5 is the only AC game i played lol. --Unsigned comment made by User:Grabacr 1

I'm also lookin for adminship someday. --Unsigned comment made by User:Grabacr 1

Adminship? We could arrange some papers (so to speak) in order to make it true. Plus, I can give SysOp status to anybody at will. So, wanna go ahead? --Unsigned comment made by User:Protostealth

Sure! --Unsigned comment made by User:Grabacr 1

(EPIC UNSIGNED FAIL)  --Havoc Reaper '48  23:41, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Recent Pages
It's good that you're making the locations and all, but shouldn't the battles be merged with the locations themselveS? Seems a little redundant to me.  --Havoc Reaper '48  23:41, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I'm doing it in the style of Halopedia: they make 2 separate articles, one for the location & other for the battle. Feels well done & organized.  Proto  Stealth   01:20, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Edit summary bawx
You do know you don't need to fill it in every time you edit? I hardly do, really only use it for major edits. You're not in trouble for not filling it in, and I don't think it can be removed either.  --REAPER  OF HAVOC '48  00:23, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Whats up man
Hey just got done editing the JA page check it out!

You know Ice, you don't have to show everyone whatever edit you make. No offense, by the way.  Proto  Stealth   19:11, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

lol
Sorry Im new and your the admin so I thought I'd better tell you lol

As I said, you don't have to tell me about your edits. You aren't being watched.  Proto  Stealth   19:18, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yo
How do I add images to a article?

See the editing bar? (exclusive to Rich Text Editor) In the middle section, click on the lone image icon, choose a picture, modify the next stats & click on Add Image.  Proto  Stealth   19:34, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

MiG 21 redirects
Wat?  --REAPER  OF HAVOC '48  22:48, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
I SUPPORT YOU MAN!!

Care to elaborate?  Proto  Stealth   17:07, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

What's Up?
Something important regarding the site, you say? Also, why did you use my SFW talk page if it concerned something here? I'm still active here y'know, I've just been busy...  --Havoc  Reaper '48  23:35, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Let's get up to speed: basically, we need to find a way for the wikia to gain popularity within the Ace Combat community, and possibly that of Namco Bandai, which would be a massive milestone. We need to find ways to gain contributors, and make this place more known. But first, I want your opinion,  Proto  Stealth   22:50, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Well, going to Wikia central and asking for a "Wikia Spotlight" thing could be a good start. In fact, makign a userpage on Wikia Central advertising the wiki could also help (I've done a similar thing). Now, Namco Bandai, I see, you could get someone form there to share some AC info. I'd start with a friendly e-mail to them (heck, if we're lucky they may even show a link to the AC wiki here in hopes of people to further understand AC). I mean, we have some pretty good editors already here (including you), but of course I'll help as well in this, count me in.

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080511072328/streetfighter/images/d/d6/Dan-snk-classic.gif  --Havoc  Reaper '48  01:20, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, excellent. I recommend that we begin advertising on Wikia Central, to build up the heat, so to speak.  Proto  Stealth   02:21, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Welcome Template Update?
"Acepedians", eh? You know, that's not a bad idea, renaming the site "Acepedia". We can contact Wikia about a site change if you want, it's been done with other wikis before as well. I like the idea myself, but what do you think?  --Havoc  Reaper '48  17:20, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

I once thought of this. We better get the ball rolling, Reaper. <>  Proto  Stealth   17:30, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, but this also means we'll need to change the site logo and the "AceWiki:____" pages (and there are still some "Electrosphere:____" pages as well). Now, do you wanna contact or should I?  --Havoc  Reaper '48  17:38, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

I'll go in representing the site. But how do I contact the higher-ups?  Proto  Stealth   17:48, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Special:Contact.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  18:06, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

O_O
Have you noticed the main page poll has NINETY votes?!  --Havoc  Reaper '48  16:04, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Then that means we haven't been forgotten by the AC community after all. We need to find a way to make those visitors become regular editors, though.  Proto  Stealth   16:32, June 13, 2010 (UTC

New Thread!!
How does it look?  --Havoc  Reaper '48  18:35, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Needs moar professional writing.  Proto  Stealth   18:42, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Orly? How would you word it?  --Havoc  Reaper '48  18:44, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

"Feel free to drop on by and give more Ace Combat info- don't be shy!" = "Feel free to drop by & add information- we certainly could use the help."

I was just trying to sound friendly... OK, I'll edit it.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  18:51, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

XBox Live Squadrons (AC6)
I am aware of there being a page where you can post info on any XBox Live Squadron you're involved in, but I was wondering if one needed permission to do so. If so, then may I post the info?

 Basic Info (Just in case): 

Name: 3113th TFS "Wywyrm"

Number of pilots: 8

Aircraft: Su-47 Berkut x8

Squad Status: Currently Training Pilots

Also, I am a major aicraft afficionado and can give all sorts of performance specs if needed. If you need any more information or pictures on any aircraft, I can get for you.

Sincerely,

Wywyrm 1 23:28, June 14, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

You don't need to require permission to advertise your squadron. As long as it's on your user page, it's all cool. Just make sure you don't follow the path of the "New Generation of Strigon Team" squadron; they kept promoting their team on our articles before HavocReaper48 nuked them from orbit.

Plus, we could really use help with the aircraft specs. Go ahead, mon ami.  Proto  Stealth   02:49, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Thank you very much. Btw, I found the NATO codename for the Su-47: Firkin (A Firkin is pretty much a wine casket).

And on another footnote, I remember encountering "New Generation of Strigon Team" while I was flying as a temporary flight lead for another squadron around January. They're almost as good as they say they are, but I managed to shoot them down with no losses in my own squad. --Wywyrm 1 18:14, June 15, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

Talk about lucky coincidence. So, did they put up a decent fight?  Proto  Stealth   20:01, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

You'd better believe they did. All members of my squad except for me flew the F-14D against them. There were several times that they almost got on my wingmen's six o'clock, but for me it was a different story, as the Su-47 can out-turn the Su-33 at low speeds. That along with the fact that I had instructed my squad to use a variation on Gualt Team's "Golden Nest" from ACZ, it was ensured that we all had mutual protection. By the time they found out what we were doing, there were only two left, both of whom I picked off with cannon fire at point-blank range. Game, Set and Match. Wywyrm: 1, Strigon: 0

Wywyrm 1 18:20, June 16, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

Impressive. I guess they never showed up with a fight ever since.  Proto  Stealth   18:46, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

They did actually, but they brought back-up this time. I was forced to drop out of the fight when the power went out in my neighborhood, but Wywyrm 2, who was flying with me and the identity of whom I am not at liberty to disclose, secured a narrow victory. Anyways, what's up on #electrosphere?Wywyrm 1 15:10, June 17, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

OK
I'm on #electrosphere, what's up?  --Havoc  Reaper '48  00:03, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

No Ace Combat 7
There is proof of no ace combat 7. It's very heartbreaking news but here is the evidence. A couple weeks ago I was at Future Shop and I saw a game that a title I do not remember but what I do know is that it said.......................... PROJECT ACES on the cover. Namco has moved on. F that

Sorry for the bad news but................24.109.65.103 14:55, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

I think that's because Project Aces might be working independently from Namco from here on out, who knows? Wywyrm 1 18:59, June 22, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

PS- Protostealth, if you noticed the monicker for Wywyrm 2 being "Guardian" on my page, and that said pilot never leaves my side in combat, I'm willing to explain to you my reasoning over Electrosphere.

More Evidence
Hi again,

There is even more proof of no more Ace combat!!!!!!!!!!!

Since we all know that Project aces like all of us know is the project that Namco used to create Ace Combat and since they have made another game, It seems they have moved. I know some of you guys might think I'm getting hiped up over nothing there is the facts and facts DO NOT LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(24.109.65.103 15:00, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, we never even have said that there is Ace Combat 7. Well, there's still the Ace Combat: Assault Horizon rumors.  Proto  Stealth   17:47, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Im on electrosphere at this very moment Protostealth. Awaiting your arrival.Wywyrm 1 23:23, June 23, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

Sorry for the wait. Im back.Wywyrm 1 01:29, June 24, 2010 (UTC)Wywyrm 1

You've gotta see this!
I found this video on Youtube that a guy put together for the Megalith mission from Ace Combat 04. He used AC4 and an FPS game I cant identify to get the perspective of Mobius 1, Mobius 2 through 8, and the ground forces inside Megalith. It's just INCREDIBLE!!!

Here's the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gKg8qFiAVE&feature=related

The FPS is from Frontlines: Fuels of warSomeguy789 04:07, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Ha! I've never played Frontlines but thats what popped into my head when I saw that! Hitman 2 (radio) 16:32, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

bro
We've got a big problem with Unregistered Contributors posting info in wrong grammar.

- User:Grabacr 1

Most likely it's because they're new to Wikia. Just sayin'.  Proto  Stealth   04:51, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. you got a point. But the wrong grammar kinda pisses me off.

- User:Grabacr 1 01:52 2010-06-24.

Perhaps they think that a Wikia works like a blog, with srcwed grramer (obvious pun) all over the place?  Proto  Stealth   04:57, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Questions
Then the village pump link should be removed then, correct? And what about the flagship articles? Hitman 2 (radio) 04:59, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Exactly. We don't need an ArbCom; that's what we dictators administrators are for. And by "flagship articles", you mean "featured articles", correct?  Proto  Stealth   05:02, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

I suppose. The link says 'Flagship'. Hitman 2 (radio) 05:04, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Then they go with the Arbcom links. I'll clean 'em up tomorrow. By the way, thanks for trying to help our Wikia; I certainly appreciate the help.  Proto  Stealth   05:06, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Its what I'm here for. And what exactly is ArbCom? Hitman 2 (radio) 05:09, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, man!
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100621210621/streetfighter/images/2/26/Ken-wins4.gif

Looks like the advertising worked! We got some guys! YESH! Also, I have a new category idea in mind: Instead of the airplane articles having just the "aircraft" category, how about that and the type of fighter they are? For example, the F-22 would be categorized as aircraft and a fighter?  --Havoc  Reaper '48  14:13, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

I like this idea. And maybe the superweapons could be divided into vehicles and installations? Like the Aigaion and Arkbird would be vehicles and Stonehenge and the Chandelier would be installations? Hitman 2 (radio) 16:26, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

My advertising idea apparently worked, after all. :)

On the categories, those ideas look great, so let's begin the categorization, shall we? Oh, and Ray, keep it up, and you might as well become a sysop!  Proto  Stealth   17:58, June 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Basically, we'll have a couple of sub-categories of the aircraft category. Also, Raymorn's a bit new for a sysop, no? (I mean, I myself had like 90 edits when Johnson promoted me.)  --Havoc  Reaper '48  00:18, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * While its true I'm new to this wiki, I do have about 500 or so edits total. Hitman 2 (radio) 00:38, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * And I have just about 5,000, yet I'm no admin on every wiki I'm on. You'll have to earn it the old fashioned way here.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  00:51, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

I was just pointing out the fact that I'm not a completely new to this. I don't expect to be an admin anytime soon. Hitman 2 (radio) 01:00, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

hello again!
Should we make a Ace combat 0 music page? - User:Grabacr 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3d3gN61gOI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4gV4DWjGY0&feature=related

I think we should. The whole point of the wikis is to document everything related to a subject. Hitman 2 (radio) 16:29, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, that is what I'm planning to do. I'm actually busy with the Shattered Skies OST, so I can't do it for the time being. By the way, here's the song template in case you need it (make sure to include it in source mode only; RTE just screws up the formatting.)  Proto  Stealth   17:53, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Categories
I think it should probably be Attack Aircraft. Sounds a bit more professional. And what do you think of dividing the superweapons up? Hitman 2 (radio) 18:27, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * " Attacker Aircraft" is the category. "___ Aircraft", basically.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  00:19, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

umm
IF YOUR PLANNING TO GET JOINT ASSAULT. . .IT'S BEEN DELAYED ~ICEYOU~

Until what date? June 29? And what is the reason for this?  Proto  Stealth   06:16, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

http://www.andriasang.com/e/blog/2010/06/15/ace_combat_delay/

US:AUG 31

JP:AUG 26

EU:N/A

ICEYOU 06:28, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

August? Well, you can't blame 'em if they want to satisfy the fanbase. Proto  Stealth   06:33, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

TWO MONTHS MAN! I BETTER UPDATE THE JA ARTICLE! SMH ICEYOU 06:37, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Dammit man, stop writing in all caps.  Proto  Stealth   06:40, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

lol BTW Can you get rid of that little box that say's Ace Combat Joint Assault is coming out next month. . .ICEYOU 06:42, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Have you seen this yet?
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/planes-and-ace-combat/700985 ICEYOU 06:49, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

HI
Yo

Your right you never said anything about there being a AC7, but I put that info on here to tell you guys that the faintest hint of AC7 might be gone now. As I said before Project Aces is the founder of AC and they have created a new game on WW2 which is way out of our timeline. As for that game, you can check Future Shop, Best Buy and your sure to see it. The AC series is as of since it started the best modern flight sim. there is. This a real bummer but there is still hope with that AC: Horizon thing. Personally I have never heard of it but:). Sice everybody was getting hyped up about the possibility of AC7 I wanted to technicly tow them back down into reality.

Thanks,24.109.65.103 13:09, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

By the WW2 game you mean Sky Crawlers: Innocent Aces. On the Horizon subject, either's it a brand new AC title or the EU name for Joint Assault, however it's all speculation for now.  Proto  Stealth   18:28, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Pilots
I think we should probably only list the people who are guaranteed to have flown the plane. We don't know the Garuda Two ever flew the CFA-44. We can't even be sure that Talisman did. You might choose not to fly it. We can only be sure that Pasternak did. So we should probably leave any pilot listings as only people who we know flew whatever plane is in question. Hitman 2 (radio) 16:03, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Well, for the sake of broadness, I think we should add the other pilots, albeit with a "(non-canon)" message by the side to indicate that they never flew the plane in question in the game's storyline canon.  Proto  Stealth   18:35, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

I don't agree with that. If we were to do that, for the sake of conformity throughout the articles we'd have to add the list of pilots and wingmen from all the games that might have flown a particular plane. You see the problem? Hitman 2 (radio) 18:42, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Don't see the problem.  Proto  Stealth   19:03, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Its excessive and unnecessary. We should just list the pilots canon says definately flew the plane. Hitman 2 (radio) 19:33, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Users
About how many registered users do you think we have regularly visiting? Seems like its only me, you, Grabacr, and Havoc. Hitman 2 (radio) 05:22, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Well, Iceman117 & Wywyrm 1 regularly visit the place, and we're good friends.  Proto  Stealth   06:02, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

@Hitman 2... Hmmm maybe you're right. Alot of people in ACS don't trust us. - User:Grabacr 1

Grabacr's right. Even after the massive manteinance & reworking from January onward, they still believe that we're an unreliable info source, filled with spam. The idiots (and pardon my language) believe that the new administration hasn't changed anything. Sure, we may be factually inaccurate in some points, however that can easily be fixed with a quick click of the Edit button.

They really need to see our site now to speak wrong of us again, I tell ya. (and who of the two has a facebook page, huh?)  Proto  Stealth   06:17, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

I have a facebook page too. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000091562681 - User:Grabacr 1

We also have a problem of people making destroy acewiki projects. - User:Grabacr 1

No Grabacr, I meant which of the two sites (Acepedia & ACS) has an FB page. Capishe?

On the DESTROY THE SITE subject, it's merely BS. There's no way that can happen. And if somebody mentions BURN TIHS SITE LOL & begins vandalizing, then aim & drop the banhammer.  Proto  Stealth   06:26, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

I think y'all need to take a tour of | The Vault, the Fallout wiki. Thats what we should be using as a model. Hitman 2 (radio) 06:50, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Model? How so? Explanation plox.  Proto  Stealth   19:54, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
What are the requirements for adminship here? Just so I know what I need. Hitman 2 (radio) 21:21, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

OK, normally, you'd need to rack up a large number of edits (around +1000) while showing respect for your fellow users & following the rules. However, the process is accelerated to M61 firing speed when someone shows a desire to help the site in ways that include formatting, articles & all that jazz. And you want to help us, by the looks of it.  Proto  Stealth   22:24, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

This is true. Hitman 2 (radio) 22:26, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

So that cuts it down to what? Hitman 2 (radio) 22:52, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

You edit en masse, and the chances of sysop status increase. You try to help the site in any useful way, chances skyrocket to around 80/90%. So, you want adminship or not?  Proto  Stealth   00:51, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

I do, I do, I dooo.... Hitman 2 (radio) 01:20, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Then lemme pull a few strings. Procedure in progress...

Hawk T1
Which of our new categories would this fall under? I lean towards fighter, but I'm not sure. And what about aircraft that are just transports or civilian airliners? Hitman 2 (radio) 21:25, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Boeing 7-- are airliners. C-5, C-17, Rhincodon & C-130 are transports. Hawk is fighter.  Proto  Stealth   22:32, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Do we not have categories for transports and airliners? Hitman 2 (radio) 22:54, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

o_0
Don't you think it's time to archive your talk page? It's quite large.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  00:54, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

It needs more sections, IMO. Also, how do you archive a talk page?  Proto  Stealth   01:17, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

The recommended page size is 30K byte's worth of stuff (see page history). Just copy all of the current stuff here and paste it on "User talk:Protostealth/Archive 1", though do it once you resolve a few issues still being discussed now. Then, see here: User talk:Sgt.johnson.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  03:11, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Yo!
What are you're hobbies?

- User:Grabacr 1

add to msn
I would but I don't have MSN, I have Yahoo. Hitman 2 (radio) 03:57, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, I went and got one. Hitman 2 (radio) 04:14, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

So what is this big favor you need? Hitman 1 (radio) 14:01, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

hello comrade
Check this screenshot i took... http://acecombat.wikia.com/wiki/File:Galm_2_and_Galm_1.png.

What do u think of it?

- User:Grabacr 1